There are many things I enjoy about fishing, but trotting a float down a river sits somewhere near the very top of the list. I really do love it, and I'm not entirely sure whether that's because of the fishing itself or because it provides an excellent excuse to stand in a river for several hours ignoring the modern world. Either way, I'm perfectly happy with the arrangement.
There are certainly worse ways to spend an afternoon having than standing next to, or in a river for that matter, staring at a tiny piece of plastic and pretending you've temporarily escaped the responsibilities of adulthood.
Don't get me wrong, I enjoy the quiver tip pulling round, the movement of an isotope in the darkness and that wonderful moment when a fish decides to have a disagreement with whatever lure you've just spent far too much money on. There is something wonderfully addictive about feeling that tug through your fingers or seeing a rod tip suddenly come alive, but when a float disappears beneath the surface and you strike into a solid fish, well, that's a different level of satisfaction altogether.
Perhaps it's because trotting requires you to concentrate completely on something that is of absolutely no importance to anyone else but has somehow become the most important thing in your life. The float is moving, the line needs controlling, the loosefeed needs to go in at precisely the right pace and somewhere underneath all that flowing water there might be a barbel deciding whether your little pellet looks sufficiently nutritious to risk eating.
It's basically a high-stakes negotiation between a man, a piece of plastic and a fish with the brain capacity to eat a pellet and then immediately swim into a snag. Somehow, despite all the evidence to the contrary, I have convinced myself that I am the professional in this arrangement.
For those few hours, nothing else really matters. The emails can wait, the phone can remain in the pocket and whatever nonsense the modern world has decided is terribly important today can carry on without me, because I've got a piece of plastic floating downstream and I'm determined to make it disappear. That's the beauty of river fishing for me.
You don't necessarily need to catch anything to feel that you've achieved something, although obviously catching something does improve the experience considerably and anyone who says otherwise is probably trying to convince themselves after a particularly barren season.
There is a strange sort of satisfaction in spending a few hours feeding pellets to fish you haven't seen, before going home hungry and telling your family you've had "a lovely afternoon." Try explaining that to someone who doesn't fish and you can actually watch their opinion of you changing in real time.
"What did you catch?" they ask, usually with the enthusiasm of someone expecting a perfectly reasonable answer. "Nothing," you reply, before explaining that you thoroughly enjoyed standing in a river for half the day achieving absolutely nothing measurable.
"Did you enjoy it?" they ask, still trying to find the positive. "Immensely," you say, because somehow that makes perfect sense to you and absolutely nobody else.
This particular Friday afternoon, after work, I fancied a reccy to a very quiet stretch that had once been home to my personal-best barbel.
The river was clearer than tap water, which is both wonderful and slightly alarming because while clear water allows you to see what's going on, it also means the fish can see exactly what you're doing.
And what you're doing, unfortunately, is standing in the middle of their home dressed like a poorly equipped aquatic burglar. You might have convinced yourself that you're being stealthy, but from the fish's perspective you're basically a large, angling idiot waving a fishing rod around.
I spent some time baiting a few swims and peering into the depths, hoping to spot signs of fish. Clear water makes you do this, although it also encourages the angler's imagination to become completely detached from reality, so that every dark shape becomes a barbel until closer inspection reveals that it is actually a branch that has been lying there since the Jurassic period.
I've lost count of the number of times I've stared at a suspicious shadow for thirty seconds, heart rate increasing, convinced I've discovered a monster. Eventually I get closer, only to discover that the biggest fish in the river is actually a bit of wood. Still, I fancied my chances. I'd decided to trot a couple of swims with a banded 6mm pellet secured to a size 16 Guru MWG hook, loosefeeding the same mixed 6mm pellets into the flow and hoping to create what I like to think of as a conveyor belt of temptation.
The idea was that the fish would see the pellets arriving one after another, become increasingly excited, locate my hookbait and immediately make the sort of poor decision that keeps anglers in business. It was a flawless plan, apart from the fish, the river and the possibility that absolutely none of it would work.
I've caught barbel from the Wye up to around 9lb using this set-up, so there was a degree of confidence behind the idea. Confidence is a strange thing in fishing, though, because there is only a very thin line between confidence and delusion, and I've spent enough time staring at empty swims to know which side of that line I normally occupy.
The first few trots were uneventful. The float went down the river, I controlled the line, introduced a little loosefeed and repeated the process, gradually becoming convinced that this particular trot was going to produce a fish despite absolutely no evidence whatsoever to support that theory.
That's another wonderful thing about fishing. You can do exactly the same thing fifty times without success and still genuinely believe that the fifty-first attempt will be the one, because the next cast always feels different somehow.
Perhaps that's why anglers are such optimists, or perhaps we're simply very good at ignoring statistical evidence when there's a rod in our hand. Give a fisherman a rod, a float and a vaguely fish-shaped stretch of river and suddenly probability becomes nothing more than an inconvenient suggestion.
I'd originally been using the Drake domed float, but eventually decided to change over to a Drennan clear jobbie. It was still a fairly substantial float in the scheme of things, but being clear I convinced myself that it would be less obvious to any wary fish below, which sounded perfectly sensible at the time.
Whether a chub or barbel actually looks upwards, sees a float and thinks, "Hang on, that's not quite right," is another matter entirely. I've never asked one, mainly because barbel are notoriously difficult interview subjects and tend to leave before you've got to the interesting questions.
"Excuse me, Mr Barbel, do you find the clear float less intrusive?" Splash. "And what are your thoughts on the 6mm pellet?" Gone, followed by several seconds of me staring into the water wondering whether I've just been ignored by a fish. Very poor media relations, really. You'd think a fish that spends its entire life underwater would be more accommodating when someone finally tries to interview it.
Still, the clear float went on and the process continued. Cast, trot, control, feed, watch, repeat; it's a remarkably simple process when you break it down, although somehow I manage to make it feel like a major expedition requiring approximately half the contents of my garage. At some point, I became so focused on the float that the rest of the world ceased to exist. We spend so much of our lives surrounded by things demanding our attention that fishing gives us permission to concentrate on something completely unnecessary and, in doing so, makes it feel incredibly important.
A float drifting down a river shouldn't really matter. A six-millimetre pellet shouldn't matter, a fish eating it shouldn't matter and certainly a bloke standing ankle-deep in a river on a Friday afternoon shouldn't matter to anyone else, but for those few moments it all matters enormously.
The float is approaching the crease, the line is just right and the loosefeed is ticking down the swim. The hookbait is travelling somewhere underneath it all and suddenly you convince yourself that this is it, despite having experienced exactly the same feeling approximately seventeen times already.
You watch and you wait, completely convinced that the next second is going to change everything. The float passes the likely spot, carries on downstream and provides you with yet another opportunity to reconsider your life choices.
Nothing happens, but you keep watching anyway because obviously the barbel might take approximately nine seconds after the float has vanished around the bend. This is perfectly logical behaviour if you're an angler and deeply concerning if you're anyone else.
Eventually you wind in and prepare for the next trot. There is no evidence that anything has changed, but somehow you're convinced that this one will be different because, well, you've put the float back in the water and that's apparently enough.
And that's fishing. You don't need evidence; you need hope, preferably combined with a 13-foot float rod, a pocket full of pellets and an unhealthy willingness to repeat the same action until darkness makes the decision for you.
Maybe that's why I love trotting so much. It's not simply about catching fish, although catching a barbel is obviously an excellent way of improving an afternoon and tends to make the journey home considerably more enjoyable.
It's about being completely present in that tiny piece of river and waiting for something to happen. Sometimes nothing does happen, and that's fine too, although I'd still prefer it if something around nine pounds happened to happen.
Sometimes the float disappears, the rod bends and the river suddenly contains the most important fish in the entire world. For a few seconds, everything else disappears and there is only you, the fish and the increasingly urgent realisation that you've got to land the bloody thing.
Other times you spend three hours feeding pellets to absolutely nothing and return home smelling faintly of river, standing water and disappointment. Both experiences, strangely enough, still count as fishing, although one makes a much better story.
And I'll happily take either. Although, if anyone asks, I'd obviously prefer the barbel.
Anyway, enough of the waffle, I started in the first swim that usually gives me a bit of encouragement, the sort of swim that practically points at you and says, “Go on then, you know you want to.” It looked absolutely textbook, with streamer weed, gravel on the bottom and enough cover to the left and right to make any sensible angler stop, unpack the tackle and immediately convince himself he was about to catch a bag of fish. Walking past it would have been ridiculous, so naturally I sat down and prepared myself for several hours of disappointment.
The first job was to feed a decent rain of pellets, partly to get the bigger fish away from the thick cover and partly because throwing bait into a river always makes you feel like something important is about to happen. I fed for a good twenty minutes and, eventually, when the fish started running down, I began to get the odd little dink on the float, which obviously meant a bite was imminent because that's how fishing works when you've read enough articles about it. Or so I thought, because what followed was trot after trot after trot with that float refusing to go anywhere other than downstream, which was beginning to feel quite personal.
I changed depths, altered the shotting, fished tight to the cover and generally poked that float into every likely-looking bit of water where a dace, chublet or something with an appetite might reasonably have been hiding. Nothing, not even a suicidal small fish that had somehow mistaken my maggot for the last meal on Earth. Way upstream from here, at exactly this time last week, it had been a bite a chuck, which made me wonder whether the fish had received a memo overnight informing them that I was coming and advising them all to stay indoors.
Perhaps matchman Shayne had been right after all when he said, “Mick, don't bother,” although naturally I had interpreted that as the sort of negative nonsense that only somebody who doesn't understand my enormous fishing potential would say. After an hour and a half I had become something of a master at trotting, in that I could now watch a float disappear downstream for several yards without experiencing even the slightest expectation that it might actually disappear under. The presentation was perfect, the float was behaving beautifully and the fish were presumably behind the cover laughing themselves silly at the idiot waving a rod about on the bank.
Eventually common sense, or what passes for it in my head, suggested that a move might be required because I didn't have an infinite amount of time and the river wasn't showing any signs of suddenly becoming embarrassed about the situation. I packed up and settled into another swim upstream, where there was a lovely run skirting some vegetation on the far bank and the float would pass beneath the canopy of a rather substantial tree. There was also some nice streamer weed and a gravel bottom, so once again the whole place looked like somebody had designed it specifically for an angler who was about to make a complete arse of himself.
I dropped some leftover groundbait and pellets into the margin and at least this time there was immediate evidence that the river contained actual fish rather than being an elaborate aquatic sculpture. Minnows appeared, then small roach and even a few decent gudgeon, all of them apparently delighted to demonstrate that they existed while simultaneously refusing to participate in my fishing. The water was painfully clear, but surely a steady trot with a few pellets going in little and often would eventually bring the better fish out to play, wouldn't it?
Well, yes, eventually there was a bite, and because I had spent so long staring at a motionless float I was completely unprepared for the possibility that it might actually do something. It buried properly and I struck into a solid fish, which immediately demonstrated that it had considerably more experience of this river than I did and headed straight for the reeds to my right.
I tried everything short of climbing into the river after it, but the fish had clearly read the chapter entitled “How To Do An Angler Properly,” and disappeared into the vegetation with a final tug that translated quite neatly as, “Thanks for the pellets, mug.”
And that, rather unfortunately, was where the entertainment ended, because trot after trot after trot produced even less action than the first swim. I changed things around, adjusted the depth and tried different lines, but the float remained resolutely above water while I became increasingly convinced that every fish in the river had gathered just downstream specifically to watch me suffer. At one point I was beginning to suspect the minnows were communicating with the bigger fish, possibly by underwater WhatsApp, warning them that the bloke with the trotting rod was still there.
Eventually the curfew arrived and I packed everything away, walking back towards the car with the tail firmly between my legs and the sort of expression normally seen on somebody who has just been comprehensively outwitted by a vegetable. I hadn't exactly covered myself in glory, but then again, the river had given me a couple of hours of peace, fresh air and enough frustration to clear the mind completely, which is probably the entire point of the exercise anyway. There are worse ways to spend an afternoon than standing beside a river being ignored by fish, so I suppose I'll call it a result and get on with the important business of planning the next one.

