Fine lines may be essential for certain styles of fishing, but they are not always indispensable. In fact, in some cases the use of a fine line could be disastrous. Nevertheless, strongly held opinions about the necessity for fine lines cannot be dismissed lightly.
I think there are several reasons for this belief in them. One of these must be the influence of habit and tradition. Canal fishing has always been associated with angling for small fish with fine tackle, and once an idea has become universally accepted its veracity is seldom challenged.
Another reason is that fine lines usually result in more bites when the slow-sinking style of fishing is used. Objections to stronger lines are usually based mainly upon the fear that the fish will see the line and will be put off from taking the bait.
But I doubt very much whether fish are capable of such fine discrimination. If they can see one line, they can see another. I doubt if there is any line they cannot see, in normal conditions.The true reason why less fish are caught with a slow-sinking bait fished on a strong line might rather be that it is not as pliable as a line of lower breaking strain.
Consequently, the bait does not fall through the water as naturally as one fished on a fine line. Since the majority of canal anglers use a slow- sinking style, an undeserved prejudice has grown up against the strong line.
A hard fighting 4lb Roach Bream Hybrid |
It increases the chance that the bait will be taken, and the supposed scaring effect that the line has on the fish will be largely negated. This I have proved to myself over and over again by catching numerous canal roach and other fish while using strong lines and large hooks.
The strong line is really most suitable for bottom fishing, though. Since the bait and part of the line are lying along the bottom, the question of unnatural action of the bait does not arise. Fine lines are most suitable for catching small fish, stronger lines for catching the larger ones. I have a place for both in my tackle stash.
The colour of the line is of some importance, too, I think. Transparent or pearl-coloured lines seem to reflect too much light, and when the sun is on the water they can often be seen quite clearly. Does this unnatural glint of reflected light have a scaring effect on the fish? I feel that it does on certain clear water venues , I tend to use green-coloured lines.
The canal I'm fishing for this session, well it's coloured proper coloured, so to be honest you can get away with anything really, that ever takes your fancy. One thing for certain though if you hook a 4lb hybrid you don't want to be undergunned.Not all lines react the same in different breaking strains either the Korum Glide for example works really well for my relatively heavy trotting line for barbel but only a couple of pound less, for floating fish the canal it tends to get more curls in it than Screech from Saved by the Bell.
A small point, perhaps, but if it leads to more fish in the net, then it is worth thinking about. The successful angler is often successful because he attends to small points that others neglect.
Now my blog name is for good reason, because not only do I love to tinker, but I also love to do whatever takes my fancy. My rod collection is testament to that, a jack of all trades, master of none, that's me to a tee, I catch fish though, more luck than judgement mind you, works for me, but it's surprising what little tweaks here and there can do.
I knew it was a roach from the fight but not exactly the size I was after. One twice the size would be nice. When they get to this size though their mouths are bigger than you think so they can easily suck in a decent piece of bread.
A 2lb canal roach is a massive challenge. A rare beast indeed.
ReplyDeleteGood luck.
Cheers matey !!
Delete